X-Git-Url: https://git.nmode.ca/Rnaught/blobdiff_plain/2d34b71c7a8da7fd0fac59b934145286b2be7b1f..e920b3e514e717fc05ed524267d3b53e272fec51:/inst/web/templates/content/estimation/about-estimators/seq_bayes.html diff --git a/inst/web/templates/content/estimation/about-estimators/seq_bayes.html b/inst/web/templates/content/estimation/about-estimators/seq_bayes.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000..8f66ab4 --- /dev/null +++ b/inst/web/templates/content/estimation/about-estimators/seq_bayes.html @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +The sequential Bayes (seqB) estimator uses a Bayesian approach to estimate R0 which updates the reproductive number estimate as data accumulates over time. +This approach is based on the SIR model, and assumes that the mean of the serial distribution (ie. the serial interval (SI)) is known. +It is assumed that infectious counts are observed at periodic times (ie. daily, weekly). +This method cannot handle datasets where there are no new infections observed in a time interval, thus, to remedy this, +some manipulation may be necessary to make the times at which infectious counts are observed sufficiently course (ie. weeks instead of days). +Further, this method is also inappropriate in situations where long intervals between cases are observed in the initial stages of the epidemic. +Finally, the R0 approximation behaves similarly to a branching process, which means that throughout, the population size “available” to be infected remains constant. +We note that this assumption does not hold for the SIR/SEIR/SEAIR compartmental models. +As such, seqB estimates should only really be considered early on in an epidemic, ie. before the inflection point of an epidemic, if the dataset being used follows these models.